Copyright © 2024 Charles Lauster Architect, P.C.

Charles Lauster Architect, P.C.

Balber Pickard, Battistoni Maldonado & Van Der Tuin

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on April 26, 2001

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Balber Pickard,
Battistoni Maldonado
& Van Der Tuin
New York City 2001

In this law office the perimeter space was limited and the views poor. The conference areas and library were placed at the center to free up the perimeter. We used etched glass with a minimum detail around the conference areas to give a bright, light and airy feeling without giving away the limited views.

The library was a low, central and unenclosed millwork assembly that allowed people to look over it but permitted storage and easy consultation. The library became the heart of the office around and through which everyone moved.

CLA was associated with Jeffrey English for this project. Jayne and Joan Michaels contributed to the furnishings.


Piazza Times Square

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on August 7, 2000

MastheadContact

Piazza Times Square

CLAblogby Charles Lauster

NEW YORK TIMES Op-Ed Submission

The tussle over where to put a statue of Frank Sinatra illustrates a quandary in the planning triumph that is the new Times Square — there is no square there. In what is now one of New York’s greatest public spaces, increasing numbers of people are jammed onto the same sidewalks that were crowded when the area was a blight. Pedestrians are too congested to even get a decent view of the area’s famous digital displays. This overcrowded mix of cars and pedestrians is frustrating and dangerous. Rather than a square or a great piazza, the Cross Roads of the World feels more like the entry ramp to a busy highway.

Times Square is what planners call a “bow tie,” so called because of the space that results when Broadway diagonally slices through one of New York’s avenues. The two streets carve up the land between them into the triangular islands that pedestrians hop between in getting across two streams of traffic. Significantly, bow ties occur at major cross-town streets, such as 14th, 23rd, and 66th Streets, and thus set the stage for major urban spectacles, Union Square, Madison Square and Lincoln Center, for instance. The announcement last week of a plan to give more space to pedestrians in a reconfigured Herald Square recognizes that bow tie’s dangerous level of congestion.

Times Square has been a major spectacle for a century. Its bow tie, from 42nd Street to 47th Street, was the center of New York theater, movies, entertainment and illuminated advertising. Today it is all those things and more. Besides entertainment, it is now a center for finance, publishing and broadcasting. This metamorphosis is due, in part, to planning concepts that embraced the jazzy spirit of Times Square as epitomized in its wonderful illuminated signage. From morning to late at night, the mix of family entertainment and vastly expanded commercial uses has brought together the city’s densest concentration of tourists, workers and New Yorkers bent on a good time.

To realize its greatness, Times Square should be a genuine square, not a roadway. The focus of a square is on pedestrians and their appreciation of the urban room around them. Creating a square would require the closing off of all or at least some of the north/south traffic from 47th Street to 42nd Street. The east/west streets could remain open.

It is true that this change would have a big impact on traffic. While vehicular movement is crucial to the life of the city, cites were not invented simply to move traffic. Rethinking north/south traffic is not too much to achieve the full potential of Times Square. Consider that most uptown traffic is moving south on Broadway; Seventh Avenue only begins at 59th Street and its contribution to the crush is less. If the closing of both Broadway and Seventh Avenue is too disruptive, southbound traffic entering on Broadway and exiting on Seventh could be maintained. The conversion of the closed roadway and the capture of the islands would still represent a tremendous change towards a true Times Square.

The cost of this grand square would not be much. No buildings are needed. No property would have to be bought. Traffic would be rerouted and the roadways turned into sidewalks. After all the millions of dollars that went into the rebirth of Times Square, the crowning achievement would be cheap.

New York needs a room for the city’s people to come together. That is what the Piazza San Marco did in Venice; it was the space for the people of the Republic. Times Square, central in Manhattan, central in the myth of New York and central in the work and play of New Yorkers today, is where the room for the people should be. The walls have been decorated with the most fantastic of electronic displays; everything is ready. Simply close off some traffic and the Piazza Times Square will be open.

{ 0 comments }

UNITE Local 62-32

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on November 26, 1999

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


UNITE Local 62-32
New York City 1999

CLA has completed many projects with the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union and its successor union, UNITE. Local 62-32, like other union locals, is part service center for members, part union hall for member and staff gatherings, and part administrative office. It is also the repository of a local’s history and memory.

62-32 is a dynamic local and thus the design is forward looking but it contains the basics of the members’ desk where benefits, dues and member services are handled, the meeting room and offices. The goal was an efficient facility that also encourages the members sense of belonging.


Union Health Center Administration Offices

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on April 26, 1999

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Union Health Center Administration Offices
New York City 199
9

The second phase of the Union Health Center project included the administrative offices and an expanded medical records department.

The medical records requirements led to massive amounts of filing. However, the Center was moving aggressively into digital medical records so that the use of prime space for active files was diminishing rapidly. The goal was to design a proper records operation next to the administrative offices such that over a short period of time the space could be given up without hurting the administrative area.


Union Health Center

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on April 20, 1998

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Union Health Center
New York City 1998

The Union Health Center is a 60,000 square foot primary medical care facility that serves members of UNITE and other unions. They moved from five floors that had last been built out in the 1950s to two larger floors in the same building. CLA assisted the UHC staff from the earliest programming stages right through State certification and operation.

The facility includes examination rooms, a radiology suite, a physical therapy center, an eye, ear, nose and throat department, a laboratory, a pharmacy and administrative areas. Great attention was given to moving patients from the waiting areas to the exam rooms crisply. From the staff’s prospective the flow was to be as smooth as possible. From the patient’s viewpoint it was to be as comforting and reassuring as possible. Robin Guenther and John Petrarca were associated with CLA for this project.


Epstein Residence

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on May 22, 1997

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Epstein Residence
Pawling, NY 1997

The Epstein residence is the main house of a horse farm on a country road dotted with horse farms. This beautiful Hudson Valley road and its white clapboard houses were important to the Epsteins who wanted their home to respect this tradition.

The three gables over the dining room, kitchen and office recall a barn further up the road. The use of clapboard ensures the connection to the other houses. Clapboard is a very efficient and technically refined cladding material. It is an example of American, wood building technology that has remained effective for almost two hundred years.

The private back of the house opens up to views of the mountains and backyard activity. It is the relaxed side of the house. The front, on the other hand, is less open and more dignified facing the passing public.


Meehan Boyle & Cohen

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on October 26, 1994

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Meehan Boyle & Cohen
Boston, MA 1994

This law firm took space in the curved building between Boston City Hall and a beautiful state court building. The views were not only dramatic but also highly indicative of the firm’s practice.

The design uses glass walled conference rooms and law library to visually connect with the landmarks beyond. On entering the firm’s reception area City Hall is to your right and the State Court to your left; from the client’s point of view this is the right place.

This project was one of the first of our digital law offices. The small, jewel like library is important to the identity of the office. It also keeps alive the “book” approach to legal research. There will always be a library.


Chung Pak Building

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on August 26, 1992

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Chung

Chung Pak Building
New York City 1992

In response to a court mandated, city detention center, Community Board #1 retained CLA to analyze the impact on the Chinatown community. CLA’s report proposed a mixed use building to screen Chinatown from the detention center. The building would meet the most pressing needs in the community — low income housing, child care, health care and small shops at street level.

Because of a remarkable partnership between two consecutive mayors and the local community the building was built as envisioned. Ten stories of low income elderly housing (HUD Section 202 housing) sits atop a podium with shops at grade, a health center on the second floor and a child care center on the third. This was the first mixed use building for HUD in the country.

CLA designed the podium and the Edelman Partnership designed the housing.


Harari Penthouse

by Charles Lauster Architect, P.C. on March 20, 1989

MastheadProjects

Institutional   Commercial   Planning   Residential


Harari

Harari Penthouse
New York City 1989

An existing one story penthouse that had originally been a maid’s quarters, was replaced with a two story, four bedroom penthouse. It’s new structure, the first floor has a living room, dining room, eat in kitchen and bathroom, maid’s room.